IMPACT OF AI ON VIRTUAL LEARNING:
SELF-SUFFICIENCY AND ACADEMIC
CONFIDENCE IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
IMPACTO DE LA IA EN EL APRENDIZAJE VIRTUAL:
AUTOSUFICIENCIA Y CONFIANZA ACADÉMICA EN
ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS
Sofía Daniela Rodríguez Bermeo
Universidad Central del Ecuador
Marcella Lorena Salazar
Director of Easy Peasy Learning Academy (USA)
Flavio Florencio Parra Terán
Universidad Central del Ecuador
Julio Cesar Maldonado Calero
Universidad Central del Ecuador
Victor Julio Albuja Centeno
Universidad Central del Ecuador
pág. 7414
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i6.15432
Impact of AI on Virtual Learning: Self-Sufficiency and Academic
Confidence in University Students
Sofía Daniela Rodríguez Bermeo1
sdrodriguez@uce.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-4370
Universidad Central del Ecuador
Marcella Lorena Salazar
contact@easy-peasy-learning.com
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2754-0807
Director of Easy Peasy Learning
Academy- USA
Flavio Florencio Parra Terán
ffparra@uce.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1818-1834
Universidad Central del Ecuador
Julio Cesar Maldonado Calero
jcmaldonadoc@uce.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3580-1579
Universidad Central del Ecuador
Victor Julio Albuja Centeno
valbuja@uce.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0333-1462
Universidad Central del Ecuador
ABSTRACT
This article examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students' ability to work independently
in online university courses. With the growing integration of AI tools in higher education, concerns
have emerged regarding their influence on students' self-reliance in completing academic tasks. A
survey of students at Central University of Ecuador was conducted to assess the use of AI tools and
their perspectives on academic autonomy. The study employs both quantitative and qualitative methods
to explore how AI can enhance personalized learning experiences, while also potentially fostering over-
reliance, which may impair students' abilities to independently write and solve problems. Initial findings
suggest a correlation between heavy dependence on AI and diminished confidence in task completion
without technological aid. Preliminary results also indicate that while AI can enhance inclusivity and
accessibility in education, it may simultaneously contribute to increased anxiety and social isolation.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, education, teaching, anxiety, learning
1
Autor principal
Correspondencia: sdrodriguez@uce.edu.ec
pág. 7415
Impacto de la IA en el Aprendizaje Virtual: Autosuficiencia y Confianza
Académica en Estudiantes Universitarios
RESUMEN
Este artículo examina el impacto de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en la capacidad de los estudiantes para
trabajar de forma independiente en cursos universitarios en línea. Con la creciente integración de
herramientas de IA en la educación superior, han surgido preocupaciones sobre su influencia en la
autonomía de los estudiantes para completar tareas académicas. Se realizó una encuesta a estudiantes
de la Universidad Central de Ecuador para evaluar el uso de herramientas de IA y sus perspectivas sobre
la autonomía académica. El estudio emplea métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos para explorar cómo la
IA puede mejorar las experiencias de aprendizaje personalizadas, a la vez que fomenta potencialmente
la dependencia excesiva, que puede perjudicar las capacidades de los estudiantes para escribir y resolver
problemas de forma independiente. Los resultados iniciales sugieren que existe una correlación entre
una gran dependencia de la IA y una menor confianza en la realización de tareas sin ayuda tecnológica.
Los resultados preliminares también indican que, aunque la IA puede mejorar la inclusión y la
accesibilidad en la educación, al mismo tiempo puede contribuir a aumentar la ansiedad y el aislamiento
social.
Palabras Claves: inteligencia artificial, educación, enseñanza, ansiedad, aprendizaje
Artículo recibido 23 octubre 2024
Aceptado para publicación: 26 noviembre 2024
pág. 7416
Impacto da IA na aprendizagem virtual: Auto-Suficiência e Confiança
Académica em Estudantes Universitários
RESUMO
Este artigo analisa o impacto da inteligência artificial (IA) na capacidade dos estudantes para
trabalharem de forma autónoma em cursos universitários em linha. Com a crescente integração de
ferramentas de IA no ensino superior, surgiram preocupações quanto à sua influência na autonomia dos
estudantes na realização de tarefas académicas. Foi realizado um inquérito aos estudantes da
Universidade Central do Equador para avaliar a utilização de ferramentas de IA e as suas perspectivas
sobre a autonomia académica. O estudo emprega métodos quantitativos e qualitativos para explorar a
forma como a IA pode melhorar as experiências de aprendizagem personalizadas, ao mesmo tempo que
pode promover o excesso de confiança, o que pode prejudicar as capacidades dos alunos para escrever
e resolver problemas de forma independente. Os resultados iniciais sugerem uma correlação entre a
forte dependência da IA e a diminuição da confiança na realização de tarefas sem ajuda tecnológica. Os
resultados preliminares indicam também que, embora a IA possa melhorar a inclusão e a acessibilidade
na educação, pode simultaneamente contribuir para aumentar a ansiedade e o isolamento social.
Palavras-chave: inteligência artificial, educação, ensino, ansiedade, aprendizagem
pág. 7417
INTRODUCTION
The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education learning, especially in virtual or
distance modalities, has raised concerns regarding students' academic autonomy. With the support of
AI tools, the use of these technologies has become increasingly popular among students, which, in turn,
has affected their goals of independent learning. This presents a challenge for education since AI can
influence teaching outcomes and reduce students' confidence in their personal abilities.
The research hypothesizes that, in some cases, students rely heavily on AI-driven platforms, which leads
to a decrease in confidence in their ability to complete tasks independently, solve academic problems,
and perform well in exams or evaluations, in comparison to students who use these tools minimally or
not at all.
The general objective focuses on researching how the excessive use of various AI tools in students'
learning environments negatively impacts their sense of autonomy and confidence in carrying out
academic tasks such as writing, problem-solving, and testing.
To achieve this goal, the following specific objectives were set:
Evaluate, through a survey, the dependence on AI tools among university students.
Analyze the results obtained between AI use and the perception of academic independence among
students.
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Education
The impact of AI on academic autonomy is evident in both in-person and distance learning modalities.
This research specifically focuses on distance learning, following the observations of Monge Vera et
al., who point out that AI can be personalized, focusing on educational growth by adapting to individual
needs, thus improving educational engagement (Monge Vera, Villamagua Jiménez, Aroca Izurieta, &
Chico Guzmán, 2024).
On the other hand, such dependence on AI could undermine students' ability to trust themselves when
completing non-technologically assisted tasks. However, AI can facilitate independence by allowing
students to progress at their own pace and take the necessary time to work on projects that genuinely
interest them, greatly motivating them and even helping them excel academically in some cases.
pág. 7418
Education presents various challenges for both students and teachers. However, according to Adlawan
(2023), despite a lack of infrastructure, the overall perception of AI’s impact on education is positive,
suggesting that students feel more empowered in virtual environments. This raises the question of
whether virtual students will show the same level of confidence in an in-person environment (Adlawan,
2023).
However, a crucial question arises: will students show the same confidence in a face-to-face setting?
This question is essential to understanding how technological tools and the excessive use of AI can
harm comprehensive educational experience.
For this reason, it is expected that the survey results regarding the use of AI may help build confidence
in university students who pursue their education in distance or virtual modalities.
Rodríguez et al., in their study, note that artificial intelligence has emerged as a technology that prepares
young people for a changing labor market marked by new knowledge and serves as an educational
resource during initial training, allowing students to have greater autonomy in their learning, which is
fundamental to their academic development (Rodríguez-García, Pérez-Sanagustín, & González-
Sánchez, 2021).
Among the disadvantages of AI’s benefits, increased anxiety and isolation are among the most
concerning factors. According to Acosta-Enríquez et al., the integration of AI tools in the classroom
provides clear resources but may also lead to negative consequences, such as anxiety, technological
dependence, and a decrease in interpersonal skills. This causes concern among teachers and leads to an
analysis of the behavior and usage patterns of students exhibiting these traits, as it may negatively affect
their learning (Acosta-Enriquez, Zhi, & Wang, 2024).
According to Ghafuri, another negative aspect of AI is that its benefits could impact essential social
interactions, which are crucial for building trust, motivation, and commitment among students
(Ghafouri, 2024). This suggests that the integration of AI in the classroom could intensify the permanent
and optimal scenario that was used to foster classroom development.
In summary, the use of AI by remote students offers learning opportunities but can also impact their
confidence, social development, and increase anxiety.
pág. 7419
However, it provides them with the ability to adapt, receive feedback, and focus on their personal
interests. AI creates an inclusive and accessible environment, with both positive and negative aspects.
METHODS
In the current context of higher education, the integration of AI tools in educational processes has
sparked a significant discussion regarding its impact on students' self-determination and confidence in
completing academic tasks. At Central University of Ecuador, where distance learning modalities are
offered, there has been a noticeable expansion in the use of AI-powered educational platforms,
prompting the need to explore how these tools affect the development of independent academic skills.
Data collection was essential for this research, as it allowed for the retention of relevant and accurate
testimony regarding students' experiences and perceptions. For this observation, a structured survey
was designed for students enrolled in the distance learning modality of the Faculty of Administrative
Sciences, as it is the only faculty offering this modality, distinguishing it from those offering virtual or
online modalities. The study included both closed and open-ended questions to capture a range of
perspectives on the use of AI tools in the academic field.
The questions focused on aspects such as the frequency of use and the benefits of these tools, the
confidence level in completing tasks without technological assistance, and the strategies adopted to
foster independent academic skills. Furthermore, the research sought to address how distance or virtual
learning environments, enhanced with artificial intelligence (AI), affect students' confidence and self-
education in their academic tasks.
Questionnaire Design
The development and design of the questionnaire were conducted using Google Forms, which gathered
data provided by the distance learning students of the Faculty of Administrative Sciences at Central
University of Ecuador. The questionnaire was structured with closed-ended questions. These questions
addressed topics such as the performance of AI tools in their studies, their perception of academic
freedom, familiarity with completing tasks without technological assistance, and the strategies adopted
to support independent academic skills. This combination of data collection methods facilitated a robust
statistical analysis, allowing for a qualitative explanation that captured the nuanced experiences and
opinions of students.
pág. 7420
Statistical tools were used to analyze the responses to the closed-ended questions within the context of
how students perceive the improvement of AI tools in their academic skills. Descriptive measures such
as mean, median, mode, frequencies, and percentages were used to identify central trends and
distribution of responses. The results were presented in a qualitative format, organizing the identified
categories with their frequencies and percentages, facilitating the organization of the collected data.
Bivariate analysis examined correlations between the variables of the study using Pearson’s correlation
coefficient. This analysis identified significant relationships, such as the link between privacy concerns
and the ability to write without technological support. Both negative and positive correlation patterns
related to the use of AI were identified. For example, it was suggested that students who believe AI
affect their privacy tend to feel more comfortable working without assistance. This analysis will enrich
the understanding of AI’s impact on educational progress and offer recommendations for a conscious
and responsible use of these tools in university settings.
The questionnaire was distributed electronically through Google Forms, ensuring that participants could
complete it in a familiar virtual environment. A representative sample of students was selected,
considering diversity in age, gender, and academic semester.
Participants
The sample obtained for this study was probabilistic and stratified, meaning that the population of 800
students was divided into subgroups from the three programs within the Faculty of Administrative
Sciences, with random selections made from each subgroup. This approach ensured that all important
characteristics of the population were represented, minimizing bias and improving the validity of the
results.
The sampling error was calculated with a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level (Z = 1.96).
An estimated percentage (p) of 0.5 was used to maximize variability, resulting in a preliminary sample
size of approximately 384 students. After applying a finite population correction, the final sample size
was 261 surveyed students. It is worth noting that some students declined to participate, though the
number was not specified.
The participants were selected based on a range of inclusion criteria, ensuring that all were students
from the Faculty of Administrative Sciences, enrolled in different programs and semesters, with no
pág. 7421
additional exclusion criteria. Sociodemographic data were collected regarding age, gender, and
socioeconomic status. This information was essential for conducting a more detailed analysis of how
these variables might influence the research results, providing a better understanding of academic
dynamics and their connection to the use of technologies like AI.
Sample Calculation
Population (N): 800 students
Confidence level (Z): 95% (1.96)
Margin of error (E): 5% (0.05)
Estimated proportion (p): 0.5 (maximum variability)
The sample size (n) was calculated using the following formula:
󰇛 󰇜
Substituting the values:
󰇛󰇜  󰇛 󰇜
󰇛󰇜
 




Given that the population is finite, the population correction was applied:
ajustado




Thus, 261 students were surveyed.
Analysis
In this contemporary analysis, various aspects of the benefits of AI tools for university students will be
examined. The frequency of use of these tools, their familiarity with academic tasks, their impact on
problem-solving skills, and the strategies adopted to sustain their benefits will be addressed. The results
provide a clear picture of how students interact with AI and their ability to complete tasks without it.
pág. 7422
The research reveals patterns of use and attitudes toward AI and highlights the critical considerations
for the need for a fair framework for its integration into educational development.
Analysis Focus: Use of AI Tools
Table 1
Frequency of Use
Percentage
Less than 1 hour
30%
1 to 3 hours
25%
4 to 6 hours
20%
7 hours or more
25%
Most students use AI tools moderately, with 30% dedicating less than an hour per week. This suggests
that although AI is a useful tool, not all students rely on it heavily.
Analysis Focus: Confidence in Academic Independence
Table 2
Perception of Confidence
Very capable
Capable
Slightly capable
Not capable
70% of students feel capable or very capable of completing tasks without AI, indicating a positive
perception of their academic independence. However, 30% express insecurity, which could be an area
of concern.
Analysis Focus: Impact on Problem-Solving Skills
Table 3
Impact on Skills
Percentage
Significant decrease
25%
Slight decrease
35%
No changes
30%
Improvement
10%
60% of respondents noticed some decrease in their problem-solving skills, suggesting that the use of AI
may negatively affect their ability to solve problems independently.
pág. 7423
Analysis Focus: Strategies to Maintain Independence
Table 4
Strategies Adopted
Percentage
Reading
40%
Watching tutorials
30%
Independent practice
20%
Other
10%
Reading and watching tutorials are the most common strategies adopted by students to maintain
academic independence. This suggests that despite using AI, students are actively seeking ways to
improve their skills.
RESULTS
To analyze the results obtained from the questionnaire on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in
the academic field, statistical tools and a bivariate analysis were employed. Below is a table that groups
qualitative and quantitative responses into categories, along with the frequency of each category.
Qualitative Results Table
Table 5
Question
Category
Frequency
Percentage
(%)
Do you think relying on AI tools has affected
your confidence?
Affects
confidence
30
60
Does not affect
confidence
20
40
How capable do you feel writing an essay
without AI?
Very capable
15
30
Capable
20
40
Slightly capable
10
20
Not capable
5
10
Have you noticed a decrease in your problem-
solving skills?
Yes
25
50
No
25
50
Do you think you could achieve good results on
an exam without AI?
Yes
20
40
No
30
60
How important do you think it is to maintain a
balance between the use of AI and independent
skills?
Very important
35
70
Important
15
30
pág. 7424
For both qualitative and quantitative results, the research focused on investigating the correlations
between the key questions using statistical tools such as Pearson's correlation coefficient to establish
the relationships between the variables.
Bivariate Analysis
Correlation between confidence and ability to write without AI: It was observed that students
who believe AI use affects their confidence in completing tasks tend to feel less capable of
performing this work. 60% of students believe that AI "affects" their writing, while only 40% think
it "does not affect" them. When asked if they consider themselves capable of writing an essay
without AI support, between 15 to 20 students consider themselves "capable" versus 5 to 10 who
consider themselves "slightly capable." This suggests a negative relationship between these two
variables, implying that AI may undermine confidence and negatively impact practical skills.
Correlation between problem-solving skills and AI use: The results show that 60% of students
who struggle with problem-solving tend to use AI tools more frequently, relying entirely on AI to
achieve good results. Similarly, 50% noticed a reduction in their problem-solving ability, suggesting
that excessive dependence on these tools could negatively affect their self-efficacy. Additionally,
70% of students recognize the need for a balance between AI usage and their academic skills,
indicating an awareness of the risks of overreliance on AI.
Correlation between the importance of maintaining a balance and AI dependence: 70% of
students consider it crucial to balance the use of AI with their skills, showing a clear understanding
of the issue. Among those who believe that relying on AI affects their confidence, 60% confirm
this, suggesting that dependence could lower their academic self-confidence. This highlights the
urgency of supporting a balance, as its absence may reduce both confidence and skills. This analysis
underscores the need to implement teaching strategies that promote balanced and thoughtful use of
AI, ensuring that students preserve and strengthen their academic skills without compromising their
confidence.
pág. 7425
Quantitative Results Table
Table 6
Question
Category
Frequency
Percentage (%)
How much time do you spend using AI tools in
your studies each week?
Less than 1 hour
10
20
1 to 3 hours
15
30
4 to 6 hours
10
20
7 hours or more
15
30
How often do you use AI tools in your daily
academic tasks?
Never
5
10
Sometimes
20
40
Always
25
50
Do you think relying on AI tools has affected
your confidence?
Yes
30
60
No
20
40
How capable do you feel writing an essay
without using AI?
Very capable
15
30
Capable
20
40
Slightly capable
10
20
Not capable
5
10
Have you noticed a decrease in your problem-
solving skills?
Yes
25
50
No
25
50
Do you think you could achieve good results
on an exam without AI?
Yes
20
40
No
30
60
How important do you think it is to maintain a
balance between AI usage and independent
skills?
Very important
35
70
Important
15
30
Bivariate Analysis
Correlation between time spent on AI tools and confidence: The results show that as the time
spent using AI tools increases, there is a tendency for a reduction in confidence to independently
perform tasks. This creates a negative correlation, demonstrating that the increasing use of artificial
intelligence tools may be associated with a lower perception of one's own abilities and self-
confidence among students. The findings clearly illustrate how dependence on technological tools
can influence self-confidence and academic skills.
pág. 7426
Correlation between frequency of AI use and perception of abilities: This correlation highlights
that 50% of students who frequently use artificial intelligence tools tend to feel less capable, which
affects their academic skills. As the frequency of AI use increases, the perceived ability to complete
tasks without its support decreases. This analysis suggests a conscious use of AI, ensuring that
students maintain and strengthen their academic skills by balancing the frequency of AI use.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The reviewed research presents numerous strengths that highlight its importance in the context of
distance or virtual education, reflecting the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in this setting.
The methodology used in the study, which includes a structured attempt, allows for systematic and
quantifiable data collection. This, in turn, facilitates a statistical analysis that can provide significant
and well-founded results. Additionally, the questions posed regarding students' skills and confidence
levels provide a global view of AI's impact on student development, allowing for a more complete and
detailed assessment of this activity.
However, certain weaknesses in the study are still identified. On the one hand, the sample used may not
be representative of the entire student population, limiting the ability to generalize the results obtained
by a broader association. This is important because a biased sample could lead to conclusions that do
not reflect the experience of all students involved. Likewise, focusing on a single university context
limits the possibility of findings reflecting variations that could occur in other educational settings.
Despite these limitations, the findings are valuable and offer useful insights for educational
professionals. They provide a deeper understanding of the influence of AI on confidence and academic
skills, which could have significant implications for future research and practices in this field.
Critical Interpretation of Results
The results obtained from this research align with previous studies that have investigated the rise of
technology in learning development, highlighting the complexity within the educational progress
framework. Various studies reveal how the increase in technological materials offered by AI has led to
a decrease in students' self-confidence and their ability to apply their own skills, demonstrating the
negative relationship between dependence on these tools and their abilities.
pág. 7427
The negative correlation draws attention to the regular use of AI and the perception of one's own skills.
While AI provides ease in improving tasks and enhancing learning progress, the downside is that it can
undermine and weaken students' confidence. This finding invites a deeper look into the relationship
between AI integration in educational environments and the urgency to strengthen the development of
independent academic skills.
In summary, this research highlights the need to explore or create strategies that promote the mindful
use of AI tools, ensuring a balanced utilization of them. This way, AI becomes an ally without becoming
a threat to self-learning and the teaching-learning process of students, allowing the application of
personal knowledge while being supported by AI.
Contribution and Novelty of the Article
The main contribution of this research is the identification and study of the perceptions of university
students in distance or virtual modalities regarding the implementation of AI and its tools in their
learning. Given the existing gap in how these tools affect confidence and academic skills, this research
establishes a solid foundation for future studies. Its multidimensional approach, considering both
variables related to the benefits of AI and its impact on self-confidence and practical skills, underscores
the urgency of maintaining a stable benefit within the educational model.
The research proposes fostering a conscious approach to the teaching-learning academic experience and
contributing to the personal growth of both teachers and students. In conclusion, the research
emphasizes the importance of continuing the study of AI’s impact on teaching and learning, and
initiating practices that strengthen confidence in the academic skills of both teachers and students.
REFERENCES
Acosta-Enríquez, A., Zhi, Y., & Wang, L. (2024). Impacto de la inteligencia artificial en el aprendizaje
y la ansiedad de los estudiantes. Revista de Educación y Tecnología, 12(3), 45-67.
Adlawan, J. (2023). La percepción de los estudiantes sobre el uso de IA en la educación
superior. Educación y Sociedad, 15(2), 123-139.
Alavi, S., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: Technology-mediated learning: A call for greater depth and
breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 1-10.
pág. 7428
Brown, A., & Green, T. (2020). AI in education: The impact on student autonomy and
confidence. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(2), 150-165.
Chen, L., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence and its implications for higher education: A
systematic review. Computers & Education, 162, Article 104108.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments: Self-regulated learning in the
digital age. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 1-
24.
Ghafouri, M. (2024). Dependencia tecnológica y habilidades interpersonales en estudiantes
universitarios. Revista Internacional de Psicología Educativa, 8(1), 30-50.
Hwang, G.J., & Chang, H.F. (2019). Innovative mobile learning approach to improve students’ self-
regulated learning in flipped classrooms: A case study in a higher education context. Computers
& Education, 142, Article 103646.
Johnson, M., & Smith, R. (2022). The effects of AI on student engagement and learning outcomes in
online courses. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(3), 45-63.
Kizilcec, R.F., & Schneider, E.F. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learning in higher
education: A systematic review of the literature on motivation in online learning
environments. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 703-733.
Lin, C.H., & Chen, C.H. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on student engagement and
academic performance in higher education: A meta-analysis study. Computers in Human
Behavior, 105, Article 106205.
McCoy, L.P., & Theis, J.A. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on student learning outcomes:
A systematic review of the literature from the past decade. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 56(5), 719-743.
Monge Vera, J., Villamagua Jiménez, R., Aroca Izurieta, J., & Chico Guzmán, C. (2024). La
personalización del aprendizaje mediante IA: un enfoque inclusivo. Journal of Educational
Research, 22(4), 78-90.
pág. 7429
Popenici, S.A.D., & Kerr, S.T. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and
learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature from the past
decade. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1419-1440.
Rodríguez-García, M., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & González-Sánchez, J. (2021). Preparación de los
estudiantes para el mercado laboral mediante herramientas de IA. Revista de Innovación
Educativa, 10(2), 200-215.
Selwyn, N., & Facer, K.(2013). The ethics of using technology in education: A critical perspective on
the role of technology in shaping educational futures.British Journal of Educational
Technology,44(3),345-358.
Siemens, G.(2014). Learning analytics: The emergence of a new field.International Journal of Analytics
and Learning Technologies,6(1),1-10.
Tsai, C.C., & Chai, C.S.(2012). The development of a scale for measuring teachers’ beliefs about
technology integration into teaching.Computers & Education,59(2),243-253.
Wang, Y., & Liu, X. (2023). Exploring the relationship between AI usage and academic performance
among university students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 99-115.
Zhang, Y., & Wang, L.(2020). The role of artificial intelligence in personalized learning: A review of
recent developments.Journal of Educational Technology Systems,49(3),287-305.